Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ren's avatar

At the risk of being a Wally & A-ing the Jacinta Price Q - “gratuitous concurrence” is one explanation to consider. Also heard 2.6 mil enrolled didn’t vote - can only find in daily mail but that’s good enough fact check for a high school dropout anyway. (Maybe RMIT could employ me?)

Expand full comment
Greg_In_Oz's avatar

Terrific write up Gagman, a mate just shared this with me and I applaud your equanimity. I’ve been trying to point out for weeks primarily that the biggest takeaway from this whole charade is that both Labor and the Libs have essentially regarded this entire charade as a cynical politicking exercise, and any authentic, honest or even charitable intent behind recognition has been lost under the barrage of dishonesty and the pathetic inner-city luvvie characters that Yes kept rolling out each week to turn off yet more undecided voters. Maybe they were all secret No voters themselves? Saying that ... if I’m allowed a critique, I’m rather astounded to read that you admire(d) Noel Pearson, who for me appears to be the personification of the woke grievance-studies grifter who’s never met a grant he couldn’t steal or a microphone he couldn’t spew bullshit into, indeed the perfect role model for modern race politics, who would choose personal glory and public attention over genuine improvement in the lives of remote communities every day of the week.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts